|
Bookmaker Odds on These Events |
![]() |
Family Court of Australia, Child Support Agency, Custody/Access, Residence/Contact, Family Breakdown, Judges, Lawyers, Mediators, Counselors, Feminists, Property Settlement, Children, False Domestic Violence Allegations, s121, Alastair Nicholson. |
It is the writers well founded opinion that the radical feminists that have usurped control of the bureaucracies of the Family Court of Australia, The Child Support Agency, the various Family and Community Services groups, Legal Services, Social Security Departments, as well as the controlling males that have used them to fortify their own power bases, have done more to destroy the long term health, wealth and happiness of men, woman and children in our society than any disease, disaster, war or whatever in Australia's history. They are dividing this nation. Their ideology that believes that fathers are not a worthy part of the family unit are only now reaping their rewards through the child/ adolescence problems erupting throughout this country, the poverty traps created for these fatherless families, and the mass desertion from all responsibilities now taking place by those disenfranchised dads forcefully removed from their children's lives. And the sad news is - this situation is going to get far, far worse for all of society unless these radicals and the alpha males using them are stripped of most of their powers as a matter of the utmost urgency.
(This is only a fantasy market and is formed from known statistics, projected figures, current trends and the writers opinions. 'Betting' fluctuations will be made as further statistics are collated. Further 'events' will be added, or changes made in the future as we see fit, and any input from outside sources will be welcome.)
Event 1.
That the father of a child born
today will be still living with that child at 10 years of age.
| No. |
|
Odds |
| 1. | Still living full-time with the child | 4/6 |
| 2. | Having more than 150 days access | 50/1 |
| 3. | Having 100 - 150 days access | 25/1 |
| 4. | Having 50 - 99 days access | 4/1 |
| 5. | Having 20 - 49 days access | 14/1 |
| 6. | Having 1 - 19 days access | 12/1 |
| 7. | Having nil access | 7/2 |
Event 2.
That the father of a child separating
with the mother today will no longer have any contact with the children
in the following years.
| No. |
|
Odds |
| 1. | Within one year | 5/1 |
| 2. | Within two years | 3/1 |
| 3. | Within four years | 2/1 |
| 4. | Within six years | 6/4 |
| 5. | Within eight years | EVENS |
| 6. | Within ten years | 4/9 |
| 7. | After ten years | 1/3 |
Event 3.
That the father of a child born
today and in the future divorced from the mother will have custody of that
child at 10 years of age.
| No. |
|
Odds |
| 1. | Mother (Sole Custody) | 1/20 |
| 2. | Father (Sole Custody) | 16/1 |
| 3. | Joint Custody | 33/1 |
Event 4.
That the father divorced from
the mother will be denied by the mother/Family Court the time he would
like with that child, and would sooner opt for one of the following options.
| No. |
|
Odds |
| 1. | Wants custody | 12/1 |
| 2. | Wants joint custody | 4/5 |
| 3. | Wants more access | 6/4 |
| 4. | Wants the same access | 8/1 |
| 5. | Would prefer less access | 20/1 |
| 6. | Wants nil access | 33/1 |
Event 5.
That at completion of any divorce
and custody matters, if there is a child being reared in the family, the
father will be left with this much in value from the joint assets collected
throughout the marriage.
| No. | Percentage | Odds
(without using a lawyer) |
Odds
(after using a lawyer) |
| 1. | Less than 10% | 20/1 | 10/1 |
| 2. | 10% to 20% | 8/1 | 4/1 |
| 3. | 20% to 30% | 6/4 | 4/6 |
| 4. | 30% to 40% | 7/4 | 4/1 |
| 5. | 40% to 50% | 10/1 | 25/1 |
| 6. | 50% to 60% | 33/1 | 100/1 |
| 7. | 60% to 70% | 200/1 | 500/1 |
| 8. | 70% to 80% | 500/1 | 1000/1 |
| 9. | 80% to 90% | 1000/1 | 5000/1 |
| 10. | More than 90% | 5000/1 | write your
own ticket |
Event 6.
That the person that initiates
separation at the various stages of the growth of the family unit are the
Mother/Father or Wife/Husband. This are based on factual figures. Can anyone
guess why? Is it the reward of children, property, "independence" and Child
Support to the mother? The use of children for financial advantage is a
sickening fact in Australian society.
| No. |
|
Mother | Father |
| 1. | No Children | 4/7 | 6/4 |
| 2. | Conception to Birth | 8/10 | EVENS |
| 3. | Child Is up to 2 Years | 1/5 | 7/2 |
| 4. | Child Is 2 to 4 Years | 1/8 | 6/1 |
| 5. | Child Is 4 to 8 Years | 1/12 | 8/1 |
| 6. | Child Is 8 to 12 Years | 1/7 | 5/1 |
| 7. | Child Is 12 to 16 Years | 1/4 | 3/1 |
| 8. | Child Is Over 16 Years | 4/6 | 5/4 |
Event 7.
That the percentage of anti-father
gender feminists and their ilk within the FCA/CSA bureaucracy is at these
levels, being far and away above societies levels.
| No. |
|
Odds |
| 1. | 0% - 20% | 50/1 |
| 2. | 20% to 40% | 10/1 |
| 3. | 40% to 60% | 6/4 |
| 4. | 60% to 80% | 4/5 |
| 5. | 80% to 100% | 8/1 |
Event 8.
That the control of our children's
destiny will be taken away from sexist judges and greedy lawyer's within
this time frame.
| No. |
|
Odds |
| 1. | Before the year 2000 | 10/1 |
| 2. | Before the year 2002 | 2/1 |
| 3. | Before the year 2004 | 6/4 |
| 4. | Before the year 2006 | 5/2 |
| 5. | 2006 or later. | 8/1 |
Event 9.
In the event that a father uses
any lawyer and goes through the Australian Family Court system (including
counselors and mediators) for child/property matters - this is what he
will come out with at the other end.
| No. |
|
Odds |
| 1. | Non custodial parent/less than 30% of property | 1/2 |
| 2. | Non custodial parent/30-50% of property | 5/2 |
| 3. | Non custodial parent/more than 50% of property | 66/1 |
| 4. | Custodial parent/less than 50% of property | 16/1 |
| 5. | Custodial parent/50-70% of property | 50/1 |
| 6. | Custodial parent/more than 70% of property | 100/1 |
| 7. | Joint custody parent/less than 30% of property | 30/1 |
| 8. | Joint custody parent/30-50% of property | 40/1 |
| 9. | Joint custody parent/more than 50% of property | 200/1 |
Event 10.
That a mother taking out a false
and malicious Domestic Violence Restraining Order in the Magistrates Court
will be protected by the system from having to answer those lies and prevent
the father a right of reply for the time period below.
| No. |
|
Odds |
| 1. | Under A Week | 100/1 |
| 2. | Under A Month | 25/1 |
| 3. | Under Two Months | 14/1 |
| 4. | Under Three Months | 10/1 |
| 5. | Under Four Months | 5/1 |
| 6. | Under Six Months | 7/2 |
| 7. | Over Six Months | 6/1 |
| 8. | Never | 1/2 |
Do you want to waste your money
and time in The Family Court of Australia, Dad? No matter how much you
throw at lawyers who always give a far rosier picture than the cold hard
facts, and how hard you fight, even if you might be a demonstrably better
parent than the mother, you will finish up at the end of the day more than
9 times in 10 as a Non Custodial Parent with around 25%-30% of the joint
assets over the years together. This is the unfortunate incentive that
mum's are given to split for even the most spurious of reasons. This is
what is helping bring about the general social destruction of this country
one piece at a time. Children now see greed, selfishnesh, lies and self
interest not only ignored, but rewarded through our Family Court system.
They are our future - and it makes our future bleak indeed. If you must
fight this corrupted and sexist system presently operating, (in my opinion)
NEVER, EVER let any lawyer take on your case. No matter how incapable or
inexperienced you are, gather as much information on the processes involved,
seek out others that have been shafted by the system, and do it yourself.
A lawyer will act as no more than a purveyor of hatred while stripping
your assests bare and getting you no more than you would have got by fighting
for yourself. Every part of the Family Court system, from counselors to
mediators to judges to lawyers are out to have the father "roll over" and
give up children and property as demanded by the mother. You can do no
more harm to yourself by fighting this abusive system yourself. This court
shows itself as nothing more than a self satisfying empire of power hungry
egos that do not give a damn about the destruction and misery it reaps
upon fathers and children. It appears to be out to expand its power and
prestige regardless of the cost to society. Whatever you do, don't play
their game.
Feminism
is to female as is racism to race.
(To
the unknown author of this memorable quote - thank you)
LINKS
Fathers
For Family Equity
The
Faces Of Feminism
Families
Need Fathers
MRA
P/L
Last updated on Monday, November 15, 1999